Debate Over Reasonable Accommodation

Mick Wall
April 14, 2008
image_pdf
image_print

Recently, Tejinder Singh Sidhu was turned away from a Calgary courthouse because he was carrying a Kirpan, a Sikh ceremonial dagger.[1] The incident evokes memories of the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Multani v. Commission Scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys and Attorney General of Quebec. In Multani, the SCC ruled that a Montreal school violated a student’s religious freedom when it banned him from wearing his Kirpan to school.[2] In that case, although the SCC found that the school went too far in imposing an outright ban, it further ruled that the school could impose certain safety conditions, such keeping the Kirpan concealed and sewn into the student’s clothing.

The Kirpan incident in Montreal is one of many incidents that have sparked an intense debate over reasonable accommodation in Quebec. Indeed, reasonable accommodation became an issue in the most recent provincial election and Premier Charest created a special committee to investigate the issue.

Subscription Form

Subscribe

Protection of Privacy – Personal information provided is collected in accordance with Section 33(c) of the Alberta Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the FOIP Act) and will be protected under Part 2 of that Act. It will be used for the purpose of managing CCS’ email subscription lists. Should you require further information about collection, use and disclosure of personal information, or to unsubscribe, please contact: Administrator, Centre for Constitutional Studies, 448D Law Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB, T6G 2H5, Tel: 780-492-5681, Email: ccslaw@ualberta.ca. You may unsubscribe from our email lists at any time.
Centre for Constitutional Studies
448D Law Centre
University of Alberta
Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5
chevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram