Volume 5.2 (1994)In this issue: The Federal Electoral Regime Confronts the Charter ... Again: A Comment on Somerville v. Canada (A.G.); Starving in the Shadow of Law: A Comment on Finlay v. Canada (Minister of Finance); Terminal Care, Terminal Justice: The Supreme Court of Canada and Sue Rodriguez; Aboriginal Rights and Delgamuukw v. The Queen
Volume 5.1 (1994)In this issue: Federalism and Democracy; Appointments to The Supreme Court of Canada; Deferring Delay: A Comment on R. v. Potvin; Further Restrictings on Access to Charter Review: A Comment on Hy and Zel's Inc. v. Ontario (A.G.)
Volume 4.4 (1993)In this issue: Constructing Canadian Identities; It's the Law of the Land: Gender and the Geography of Hope; The Supreme Court Entrenches Parliamentary Privilege Out of the Charter's Reach: Donohoe v. CBC; The Possibilities of Schachter: A Response to Professor Duclos; Constitutionalizing the Patriarchy: Aboriginal Women and Aboriginal Government
Volume 4.3 (1993)In this issue: The Changing Face of Human Rights in Canada; The Supreme Court and Mandatory Retirement: Sanctioning the Status Quo; Distinguishing Zundel and Keegstra; A Constitutional Revolution: Israel's Basic Laws; The Canadian Charter as a Model for Israel's Basic Laws; The Australian Republican Movement and its Implications for Canada
Volume 4.2 (1993)In this issue: Learning From Failure: Lessons From Charlottetown; Stepping Stone or Pyrrhic Victory? Reform and the Referendum; The Canada Clause That Was: How Courts Use Interpretive Clauses; Treaty Indigenous Peoples and the Charlottetown Accord: The Message in the Breeze; Solutions to the Future of Canada and Québec After the October 26th Referendum: Genuine Sovereignties Within a Novel Union; Banquo's Ghost and Other Constitutional Incubuses: Some Lessons from the Charlottetown Process; Amending the Canadian Constitution; Canada's Quest for Constitutional Perfection
Volume 4.1 (1992)In this issue: Alberta Nurses v. A Contemptuous Supreme Court of Canada; Treaty Federalism; Harm Revisited: R. v. Butler; Britain's Quiet Revolution; A Remedy for the Nineties: Schachter v. R. and Haig & Birch v. Canada
Volume 3.4 (1992)In this issue: Oldman and Environmental Impact Assessment: An Invitation for Cooperative Federalism; Living Tree?; Canadian Council of Churches v. The Queen: Public Interest Takes a Back Seat; Whatever Became of the Westminster Model?; Constitutional Reform in South Africa
Volume 3.3 (1992)In this issue: Shaping What Future for Canada? A Prospective Analysis of the Federal Government's Constitutional Proposals; Living in a Material World: Property Rights in the Charter; Fearful Symmetry: Constitutional Uniformity and the Federal Amendment Proposals; Distinct Status for Québec: A Benefit to English Canada; Beads and Trinkets Take on New Form in Federal Constitutional Proposals for Aboriginal Peoples in Canada; Thoughts on Constitutional Amendments Recognizing an Inherent Aboriginal Right to Self-Government; On Senate Reform; Living Tree or Wired Bonsai? The Federal Government's Constitutional Proposals on the Economic Union; The Agenda for Constitutional Reform; Shaping Canada's Future Together or A Doomed Attempt to Escape from Reality; The Delegation Power Past and Present; "The West": Myth or Reality in the Constitutional Reform Process?
Volume 3.2 (1992)In this issue: R. v. Seaboyer: Pornographic Imagination and the Springs of Relevance; Surprising and Disturbing? The Saskatchewan Boundaries Decision; Lavigne v. Opseu: Stumbling Towards a Freedom From Association; A Cap on CAP; The Market and the Constitution
Volume 3.1 (1992)In this issue: The idea for the symposium, conceived originally by Alan Cairns, was to gather scholars to think imaginatively about our future constitutional prospects in a closed session. In this way, rhetorical stances could be replaced with genuine dialogue. Participants were asked to come, not with prepared papers, but only with their thoughts on several questions circulated before the meeting. This is a report of that discussion. Because of the closed nature of the symposium, the identity of speakers generally remains anonymous. Some of the participants, however, have kindly offered their views arising out of the symposium, and they are included in this issue.
Volume 2.4 (1991)In this issue: The Amending Formula and the Agenda for Change; The European Social Charter: An End to Thatcherism?; Committee for the Commonwealth of Canada v. Canada: Expression on Public Property; Mental Health and the Charter; R. v. Chaulk and R. v. Swain: Insanity and the Constitution; Indeterminate Custody After Swain; Psychiatric Treatment and the Charter
Volume 2.3 (1991)In this issue: Reforming the Amending Formula: The Case for a Constitutional Convention; Supreme Court Appointments; Applying the Charter: What is Government?; The Search for Reasonable Limits: Is Oakes Retired?; Free Speech and Its Harms; The Charter and Racism; A Review of the Keegstra Case: Supreme Court Upholds Hate Propaganda Law; A Review of the Taylor Case: Using Human Rights Legislation to Curb Racist Speech
